Multi-Agent System

Five agents. Four frameworks.
Zero cheerleading.

A production multi-agent system that debates investment opportunities the way a real committee would. with structure, dissent, and accountability.

The story

Jonathan runs a family office. He'd been pitched every AI product on the market. and all of them did the same thing: told him what he wanted to hear. "Great pick!" "Strong fundamentals!" "Looks promising!" Cheerleaders, not analysts.

What he actually needed was pushback. A system that would stress-test ideas, find the holes, and force a real debate before capital moved. Not one AI voice. a committee.

So we built one. Five specialized agents, each with a distinct analytical philosophy, orchestrated through four different frameworks. They don't agree with each other. by design. The CIO synthesizes, Sentinel challenges, and four strategists argue from fundamentally different positions.

The result isn't a recommendation. It's a structured debate with a documented decision trail. conviction scores, risk flags, dissenting opinions, and a final synthesis that earns its conclusion.

The Committee

Chief Investment Officer
Quan

Orchestrates the entire committee. Receives raw research, routes it to the right strategists, synthesizes debate output into a final investment memo. Manages multi-session context across all agents via Mosaic.

Orchestrator Mosaic OpenClaw
Risk & Compliance
Sentinel

The designated skeptic. Reviews every thesis for downside risk, regulatory exposure, liquidity traps, and concentration issues. If nobody objects, Sentinel objects anyway. that's the job.

Risk Analysis Devil's Advocate Compliance
Investment Strategists
Buffett
Value Investing

Moats, margin of safety, intrinsic value. Looks for businesses a child could run. Patient, contrarian, allergic to hype.

Lynch
Growth at Reasonable Price

PEG ratios, hidden gems, ten-baggers. Invest in what you know. Finds opportunities before Wall Street notices them.

Fisher
Quality Growth

Management quality, R&D spend, scuttlebutt method. Fifteen questions to ask before buying. Holds forever if the thesis holds.

Wood
Disruptive Innovation

Technology convergence, S-curves, exponential growth. Bets on paradigm shifts before consensus. High conviction, long horizon.

How it works

1
Submit a thesis

Drop a stock ticker, sector thesis, or investment memo. Quan routes it to the right strategists.

2
Independent analysis

Each strategist evaluates from their own framework. No groupthink. they don't see each other's work.

3
Structured debate

Sentinel stress-tests every bull case. Strategists defend or concede. Disagreements are preserved, not smoothed over.

4
Synthesis & memo

Quan compiles everything into a structured investment memo with conviction scores and the full dissent record.

Output
Conviction score (1-10) with justification
Risk flags & regulatory concerns
Dissenting opinions (preserved verbatim)
Final investment memo with decision trail
"When the system works, you stop hearing what you want to hear. and start hearing what you need to hear."
- Jonathan, after the first live run

Beyond investments

The committee pattern works anywhere structured dissent improves decisions.

Legal review

Multiple legal frameworks argue a case from different angles before a senior agent synthesizes.

M&A due diligence

Financial, operational, cultural, and market-fit agents each score an acquisition target independently.

Product strategy

Customer research, engineering feasibility, market timing, and business model agents debate feature priorities.

Executive decisions

Strategy, finance, operations, and risk agents produce a briefing document with clear recommendations and dissent.

Blueprint Available
Deploy this system for your clients

The Investment Committee is a fully documented Blueprint. Clone the architecture, swap in your domain expertise, and deploy a multi-agent decision system in days.

6 agents included 4 frameworks Mosaic orchestration Full documentation
View Blueprint →